Sunday, November 20, 2011

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Module 6

Learning in a Digital World
Reflecting on my learning and teaching experiences, I believe that teachers need to use the behavioral approach at the early years and low cognitive levels.  This will build the knowledge foundation to incorporate the cognitive and constructivist approaches in later years and high cognitive levels.  Teachers need to adapt the best of each approach and implement them according to the students’ needs (Kapp, 2007).  Teachers need to model the final product and make connections to real-life situations.  Moreover, teachers need to know and understand their students to create meaningful and relevant learning activities according to the students’ cognitive levels.  At the same time, teachers need to create an inviting learning environment where students actively participate without any fear.
            Teachers need to prepare students for their future.  They need to incorporate the available technologies into their curricula to engage students in the learning experiences.  In this way, teachers are becoming lifelong learners in order to keep up with technology, so they can transfer the current technological skills to their students.  Teachers need to understand technology and how they are going to integrate to capitalize students’ achievement (Siemens, 2006, p. 41).  Moreover, teachers need to prepare students to manage their time, become responsible of their own learning, and work collaboratively with other for their own wellbeing and society.

References:
Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing Knowledge. Retrieved from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/courses/72030/CRS-WUEDUC8812-5701377/siemensknowingknowledge.pdf

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Module 5

New Technologies
            As an educator, I have coworkers who are not incorporating technology into their curricula.  They are afraid to lose control of their classes if technology does not work as the way they planned.  Some of these coworkers are still using overhead projectors and transparencies to deliver instruction.  I have offered them my help, and we had created lessons using technology.  The teachers were pleased to see students’ interaction and learning outcomes. Students worked cooperatively throughout the learning process.
            The following is an analysis of the above situation using the Keller’s ARCS model (Driscoll, 2005, pp. 352-343).
Attention
It is low.  These educators are successful with their own methods.  They fell uncomfortable around technology.  If they there are problems with technology, they would be afraid to lose control of their classes because they could not fix the problems.
Relevance
It is low.  They see technology as a burden because their methods help students succeed in the past.  They use technology sporadically to satisfy they school and district requirements.
Confidence
It is variable.  Most teachers use technology for their own benefit but not for instruction.  They feel embarrassed when technology does not work as expected.   Some times, they feel uncomfortable because students know more than they do.
Satisfaction Potential
It is moderate to high.  If the integration of technology works as planned and students are successful, teachers feel that technology works well.
            I would recommend meeting, with these teachers, to discuss what they want to teach.  Once they know what to teach, it is necessary to brainstorm on what technology to use and how it will help engage students in the learning process.  I would also remind teachers that we, as educators, need to teach students technological skills for their present and future benefit.  At the same time, this is also beneficial to them (teachers) because they are learning the technological skills to be functional in today’s world.

Reference
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson
Education, Inc.

Sunday, October 23, 2011

Module 4



Connectivism Mindmap

Please click here to see the mindmap

How has you network changed the way you learn?
            I used to listen to my parents, adults, and teachers to gain knowledge in the past.  I also studied my textbooks and school notes.  Now, networking and technology have open up doors that keep me learning and advancing professionally.  For instance, my dream is to become a doctor in education, but I do not have the time to go to the university.  Through my work, I found out about distance learning education.  I was able to enroll and complete a master program in technology.  Now, I am working on a doctorate program in educational technology.
Which digital tools best facilitate learning for you?
            The best digital tool for me is the Internet because it allows me to advance academically.  It also provides communication means such as the email, messengers, and blogs.  The Internet offers a lot of information and how to do things, but it is essential to identify reliable sites.
How do you learn new knowledge when you have questions?
            If I have questions, I search the Internet for answers.  I can find almost everything, but I need to know how to look for it.  I also ask my friends, and this helps me brainstorm.  Later, I reflect on what I need, so I pick and choose what I think is the best answers for my questions.  In this stage, I am acquiring and creating my own knowledge as stating by Siemens (2006).

Reference
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing Knowledge. Retrieved from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/courses/72030/CRS-WUEDUC8812-5701377/siemensknowingknowledge.pdf